Re: Rule Enforcements
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 8:15 pm
Trust me, I know she puts a lot of time and love into these pieces. >_> And about detail loss - trying to retain the detailing of Satomi's glitter hooves would be a struggle between optimizing and sizing and all the other possible complications. Wasn't it while you were working on her, Foxx, that you said it's gotten to where it takes about an hour per square inch? Yikes, that's some love!
Like I said, I hadn't even *considered* it would be classified as editing it. Now that I know the detailing I'll go about fixing it, of course. It wasn't even the "this needs fixed, just so everyone is aware" because for some of the rules the clarification was really helpful. It was bringing up abandonment that got my hackles up, and so has the "we could be meaner," especially since mistakes happen. Intentionally and knowingly breaking the guidelines is completely different from "oh yeah - whoops!"
It is nice to know that, if all else fails, a full sized link would be accepted, Foxx. It's great that you really are willing to try and work with us. And the clarification that the main point honestly was "oh, this has been noticed and needs fixed" helps a lot, too - it makes perfect sense that those who can't ever get to be in compliance due to being nonactivr would be the ones at risk of abandonment, because it *does* need fixed.
I am honestly going to try my best to simply get the full sizes up there, though - with the new HTML editor I'm pretty sure I have an option to skip their automatic scaling. ^_^ And since you're ok with frames I can think of all sorts of embellishments to show the lovelies a bit of extra love - a wooden look with vinework for Oakheart, for example! I'm sort of getting excited about that stark white background now, lol. Besides, it really helps show off those transparent/fade out parts you've gotten so good at a *lot* better. ^_^ I plan on trying to get it all fixed at some point tonight - luckily I just started my weekend!
Like I said, I hadn't even *considered* it would be classified as editing it. Now that I know the detailing I'll go about fixing it, of course. It wasn't even the "this needs fixed, just so everyone is aware" because for some of the rules the clarification was really helpful. It was bringing up abandonment that got my hackles up, and so has the "we could be meaner," especially since mistakes happen. Intentionally and knowingly breaking the guidelines is completely different from "oh yeah - whoops!"
It is nice to know that, if all else fails, a full sized link would be accepted, Foxx. It's great that you really are willing to try and work with us. And the clarification that the main point honestly was "oh, this has been noticed and needs fixed" helps a lot, too - it makes perfect sense that those who can't ever get to be in compliance due to being nonactivr would be the ones at risk of abandonment, because it *does* need fixed.
I am honestly going to try my best to simply get the full sizes up there, though - with the new HTML editor I'm pretty sure I have an option to skip their automatic scaling. ^_^ And since you're ok with frames I can think of all sorts of embellishments to show the lovelies a bit of extra love - a wooden look with vinework for Oakheart, for example! I'm sort of getting excited about that stark white background now, lol. Besides, it really helps show off those transparent/fade out parts you've gotten so good at a *lot* better. ^_^ I plan on trying to get it all fixed at some point tonight - luckily I just started my weekend!